Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with decreased survival in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with poor prognosis in patients with solid tumors. However, few studies have assessed the association between socioeconomic parameters and prognosis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), and these report conflicting results. Our monocentric study assessed the impact of socioeconomic deprivation using the validated EPICES (Evaluation of Deprivation and Inequalities in Health Examination Centers) score in a prospective cohort of intensively treated AML patients. METHODS: EPICES questionnaires were given to patients receiving intensive chemotherapy for newly diagnosed AML at the Paoli Calmettes Institute between July 2012 and December 2014. Study participants were categorized as non-deprived (score <30.17), deprived (score 30.17-48.51), or very-deprived (score ≥ 48.52). The primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS). The independence of EPICES score effects was analyzed via Cox regression with adjustment for confounding factors. RESULTS: 209 AML patients received the questionnaire, 149 (71.3 %) patients responded. The median EPICES score was 23.6; 26.8 % and 10.1 % of patients were deprived and very deprived, respectively. OS was 23.16 months (95 %CI [17.15-33.31]). According to multivariate analysis, a very-deprived EPICES score, European Leukemia Net categories, age, smoking, and the absence of allogeneic stem cell transplantation were independent factors associated with decreased OS. CONCLUSION: Our results underscore the importance of integrating nonbiological factors in the prognostic stratification of AML patients. The very deprived population exhibited worse OS, confirming that socioeconomic parameters play a role in patient outcomes in AML. Very deprived patients with AML should receive specific attention and adapted clinical management.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of haploidentical vs matched unrelated allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells transplantation in patients older than 55 years.

Due to limited donor availability, high comorbidities, and cost issues, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant is not universally accessible. The aim of this study was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of haploidentical vs matched unrelated transplant. This retrospective study included patients with hematological malignancies older than 55 years who underwent haploidentical or matched unrelated transplant between 2011 and 2013 in Marseille. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio has been calculated using the mean overall survival and the mean transplant costs. Costs were calculated using a micro-costing strategy from the hospital perspective and a time horizon at 2 years. Haploidentical transplant was considered an innovative procedure and matched unrelated transplant as the reference. Probabilistic and sensitivity analyses were performed on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. During inclusion, 29 patients underwent haploidentical transplant and 63 matched unrelated transplant. In haploidentical and matched unrelated transplant, the mean overall survival was 19.4 (1.6) months and 15.1 (1.2) months (p = 0.06), respectively, and the mean cost was 98,304 (40,872) € and 151,373 (65,742) € (p < 0.01), respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was assessed to -148,485 (-1,265,550; -64,368) € per life year gained. Among older patients suffering from hematological malignancies, haploidentical transplant seemed in our analysis to be cost-effective compared with matched unrelated transplant.

[Sport coaching for psychological and social recovery after hematological cancer: An innovative perspective]. / Le coaching sportif pour un rétablissement psychologique et social : une perspective innovante.

This study is a first step towards the transfer of knowledge and practices between psychological support and performance in elite sport and a patient's "social recovery" in oncology. This proposal brings together people engaged in a variety of healthcare and relationship support roles, and aims to set up a support system beyond the hospital context. It questions the ability of elite sport management and its main actors, the "Great Coaches", to contribute to the support of patients in cancer remission through an onco-coaching approach. This innovative proposal is initiated by a life coaching pilot study designed for hematologic cancer patients in remission after a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.